FuturesElite (futureselite.com) sells prop-firm challenges the way a game sells loot boxes. A pop-up offers a free “Market Maker Pack containing 3 Elite Cards” with “payout boosts” and “easier rules”, and the menu lists “Elite Packs” and “Skills & Quests”. One Australian trader says he never got as far as a payout.
The sales pitch
| Headline | Up to $1.5M in capital “on day one” |
|---|---|
| Bundle | 10 × 150K Prime, “The tenth one is free” |
| Payout cap | $2,000 on a 50K Elite account |
| Split | 90% |
| Extras | Card packs with “payout boosts” and rule changes |
| Domain registered | 27 September 2023 |
Selling accounts in bundles of ten rewards the firm for volume, not for traders who pass. A $2,000 payout cap on a $50,000 account means even a trader who does everything right can only withdraw a small part of what the account shows.
ALSO SEE THIS REPORT 👉
Plus500 Review: Why Thousands of Traders Are Questioning This CFD Giant’s Practices
Why card packs and quests matter
When rules can be changed by a collectable card, the rules are not fixed. A trader cannot know in advance which conditions apply to his account, and the firm keeps the final say. That is the opposite of what a funding contract should be. The named payouts FuturesElite shows, such as “Brian, USA, $24,000”, link to its own Discord, not to any independent record.
⚠ FuturesElite at a glance
- Card packs that change rules and payouts.
- Biometrics demanded before a pass review.
- $2,000 payout cap on 50K accounts.
- Domain registered September 2023.
Sources: trader complaints published on an independent forex review forum (October 2025); futureselite.com (checked 28 October 2026); RDAP record. General information only.
Asked for biometrics by FuturesElite?
WARNING: MUST READ 👉
Argus Interfx Review: Unregulated Broker, Regulation Concerns
Or write to support@ettran.com — Do not send identity data you are unsure about. Talk to us first.
Biometrics before a pass
In October 2025 a trader from Adelaide said FuturesElite asked for biometric data before it would even review his trades to tell him whether he had passed. He says it then failed his evaluation on an unwritten rule, argued over what counts as “break even”, changed rules without notice and accused him of submitting false documents.
His view is that the business runs on failed evaluations and data collection rather than funded accounts. He described the demand for biometrics before a result as coercion.
Failed a FuturesElite evaluation on an unwritten rule?
Or write to support@ettran.com — Keep the rules page as it read on the day you paid.
